FERTILITY AND FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Abstract

The study of shifts in the fertility dynamics during crisis periods along with changes in the system of family policy in European countries is a relevant direction of research for the further development of Ukraine’s demographic policy, increasing its effectiveness, especially in the period of post-war reconstruction. In this regard, the purpose of our paper is to find out the changes in trends and structural characteristics of fertility in the first years of the COVID-19 pandemic in European countries in combination with the analysis of change in family policy, effectiveness of current and implemented during this period policy measures. The main methods used in the paper were systematization and generalization of statistical information from various sources, structural-logical and comparative analysis and critical assessment of measures implemented to counter crisis situations in developed European countries. The scientific novelty consists in generalizing fertility characteristics and family policy measures to counteract the negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on family wellbeing in European countries. The grouping of European countries was based on the changes that occurred in the fertility dynamics on the eve of the COVID-19 pandemic and in 2020—2021. In most countries, there was a decrease in the total fertility rate in 2020 followed by a rather sharp rise in 2021. This became possible due to the increase in childbirth among women of middle and older reproductive age. The countries in which there was a long period of decline in the total fertility rate before the epidemic but in 2021 fertility increased despite the complexity of the epidemiological situation (Ireland, the Netherlands, Iceland, Norway) have drawn the most attention. Consistency, comprehensiveness, adherence to principles, variety are key characteristics of family policy that strengthen reproductive resilience. Along with providing financial assistance to families with children, in many countries, parents were given additional paid leave, measures were introduced to counter the dismissal of employees who have children, support was provided to institutions that continued to provide childcare services, and remote employment opportunities were expanded. The issues of the influence of population’s trust in the government (especially in periods of crisis) on formation of reproductive intentions and their realization need further study.

REFERENCES

1. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 (2020, March). WHO. https://web.archive.org/web/20200311212521/https://www.who.int/dg/ speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-oncovid-19---11-march-2020
2. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing (2023, May). WHO. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-openingremarks-at-the-media-briefing---5-may-2023
3. Sobotka, T., Jasilioniene, A., Galarza, A. A., Zeman, K., Nemeth, L., & Jdanov, D. (2021, March 24). Baby bust in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic? First results from the new STFF data series. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mvy62
4. Jdanov, D., Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Jasilioniene, A., Galarza, A., & Nemeth, L. et al. (2020). Short-Term Fertility Fluctuations Data series (STFF). Methodological note. The Human Fertility Database. https://www.humanfertility.org/File/GetDocumentFree/ Docs/STFFnote.pdf
5. Sobotka, T., Jasilioniene, A., Zeman, K., Nemeth, L., Winkler-Dworak, М., & Galarza, A. et al. (2021). Booms, busts and trend reversals? Shifts in births and fertility rates across the highly developed countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.demogr. mpg.de/mediacms/16374_main_Sobotka%20et%20al_COVID19%20and%20fertility_ Pandemic%20Babies_Berlin_13Dec2021.pdf
6. Norlén, G., Bogason, A., & Cuadrado, A. et al. (2022). The State of the Nordic Region 2022: report. http://doi.org/10.6027/R2022:2.1403-2503
7. Mamelund, S. Е. (2004). Can the Spanish Influenza Pandemic of 1918 Explain the Baby Boom of 1920 in Neutral Norway? Population, 2004/2, 59, 229—260. https://doi. org/10.3917/popu.402.0269
8. Mamelund, S. E. (2012). Fertility Fluctuations in Times of War and Pandemic Influenza. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 206, 1, 140—141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ infdis/jis315
9. WHO to convene an International Health Regulations Emergency Committee on Zika virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal malformations (2016). WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-01-2016-who-to-convene-an-internationalhealth-regulations-emergency-committee-on-zika-virus-and-observed-increase-inneurological-disorders-and-neonatal-malformations
10. Rangel, M. A., Nobles, J., & Hamoudi, A. (2020). Brazil’s Missing Infants: Zika Risk Changes Reproductive Behavior. Demography, 57 (5), 1647—1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524- 020-00900-9
11. Lindberg, L. D., VandeVusse, A., Mueller, J., & Kirstein, M. (2020). Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the 2020 Guttmacher Survey of Reproductive Health Experiences. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/early-impacts-covid-19-pandemicfindings-2020-guttmacher-survey-reproductive-health
12. Goldstein, J., Kreyenfeld, M., Jasilioniene, A., & Örsal, D. D. K. (2013). Fertility reactions to the ‘Great Recession’ in Europe. Demographic Research, 29 (4), 85—104. https://doi. org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.4
13. Plach, S., Aassve, A., Cavalli, N., Mencarini, L., & Sanders, S. (2024). COVID-19 Policy Interventions and Fertility Dynamics in the Context of Pre-Pandemic Welfare Support. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12557
14. Daly, M., & Ryu, S. (2023). Child-related Social Policies in Europe during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social Policy, 1—18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000351
15. Churchill, H., Sandbæk, M., Jackson, A., Jerinić, J., Arsić, J., & Dobrotić, I. et al. (2021). The conceptualisation and delivery of family support in Europe. A review of international and European policy frameworks and standards. https://eurofamnet.eu/system/files/ wg2_policyreviewreport_sept_2021.pdf
16. Hallaert, J., Vassileva, I., & Chen, T. (2023). Rising Child Poverty in Europe. Mitigating the scarring from the COVID-19 pandemic. IMF Working Papers, WP/23/134. https:// www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2023/English/wpiea2023134-print-pdf.ashx
17. Blum, S., & Dobrotić, I. (2021). Childcare-policy responses in the COVID-19 pandemic: unpacking cross-country variation. European Societies, 23 (sup1), S545—S563. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1831572
18. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (2022). Gender equality and work-life balance policies during and after the COVID-19 crisis: thematic review 2022: synthesis, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/50106
19. Total fertility rate in the United Kingdom from 1961 to 2021 (2024). Statista. https://www. statista.com/statistics/284042/fertility-rate-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
20. Nisén, J., Jalovaara, M., Rotkirch, A., & Gissler, M. (2022, May 7). Fertility recovery despite the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland? https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/fxwe3
21. The unequal impact of COVID-19: A spotlight on frontline workers, migrants and racial / ethnic minorities. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). https://www. oecd.org/en/publications/the-unequal-impact-of-covid-19-a-spotlight-on-frontlineworkers-migrants-and-racial-ethnic-minorities_f36e931e-en.html
22. 2. Maternal employment rates. OECD Family Database (2024). OECD. https:// www.oecd.org/els/family/LMF1_2_Maternal_Employment.pdf
23. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC) (2023). ESS10 — integrated file, edition 3.2 [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess10e03_2
24. Picken, N., Feyerabend, K., & Kunertova, L. et al. (2021). Juggling work and childcare during COVID-19: how EU Member States supported working families in 2020. European platform for investing in children: fourth annual thematic report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/557994
25. European Child Guarantee (2024). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/social/ main.jsp?catId=1428&langId=en