THE ROLE OF THE RESILIENT POTENTIAL OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS IN RECONSTRUCTION OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF UKRAINE

Abstract

The relevance of the research on the resilient potential of public organizations in Ukraine is determined by the need to increase the regenerative capabilities of territorial communities within a limited time frame and with restricted resource suport. The purpose of the article is substantiating the resilient potential of public organizations as an effective tool for increasing the adaptive capacity and self-organization of public community, mitigating the destructive consequences and accelerating recovery of territorial communities during the Russo-Ukrainian war and in post-war period. The novelty of the article consists in identifying the impact of public organizations on the resilient recovery of territorial communities in the conditions of the Russo-Ukrainian war. The research was carried out using the systems approach method, techniques of abstraction and generalization, functional and comparative analysis, statistical methods and data analysis, graphic method. The influence of public organizations on the resilience of territorial communities was analyzed by means of correlation-regression analysis. Three indicators of the resilient potential of territorial communities of the country were selected according to the criterion of significance and the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Namely: profitability of local budgets per person, cash income of households, the size of informally employed population as a sign of the shadow economy. The main functions of public organizations in ensuring the resilience of territorial communities have been disclosed. It is substantiated that the most effective tools for the influence of public organizations on ensuring the resilience of communities in the conditions of the war and post-war period are active means (promotion of citizens’ mobility, formation of public opinion, public control) and segmental tools (influence on certain population groups, infrastructure objects, territories etc.) with a fixed effect (legal assistance to internally displaced persons, reconstruction of the destroyed property and healthcare facilities, improvement of epidemic living conditions, ensuring the operation of a humanitarian center, collection of necessary information).

REFERENCES

1. Portnikov, V. (2024). Ella Libanova: The Israeli wartime economic model is the best for Ukraine. Espreso. https://espreso.tv/ekonomika-ella-libanova-izrailska-model-ekonomikipid-chas-viyni-e-naykrashchoyu-dlya-ukrainii [in Ukrainian].
2. Zaiats, Т., & Kravtsova, Т. (2022). Socio-economic potential of Ukrainian communities in the conditions of military operations. Efficient economy, 7. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307- 2105.2022.7.5 [in Ukrainian].
3. Zaiats, Т., & Kravtsova, Т. (2022). Responsibility in socio-economic policy of communities: principles and problems of implementation. The scientific heritage, 93 (93), 25—32.
4. Zaiats, T. A., Zvonar, V. P., Novak, I. M., & Zhakhovska, V. L. (2019). Institutional me chanisms for balancing the distribution of social responsibility in society. In: Economic efficiency vs social justice: Ukraine’s development priorities at the stage of overcoming the crisis. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 117—149 [in Ukrainian].
5. Zvonar, V. P. (2021). Determination of the level of public activity and ways of its stimu la tion based on state registers. In: O. Gladun & M. Puhachova (Eds). Electronic regis ters: areas of use. Kyiv: IDSS, 70—85. https://idss.org.ua/arhiv/registers2.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Zvonar, V., Dyakonenko, O., & Kotenko, T. (2023). Social capital in labor relations influenced by digitalization trends. In: S. Wróbel & K. Skonieczny (Eds). Regimes of Ca pital in the Post-Digital Age. Series: Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought. London: Taylor & Francis, 170—178. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003372578
7. Aksyonova, S., & Shevchuk, P. (2024). Characteristics of demographic resilience of the population in Ukraine during the pandemic of COVID-19. Demography and Social Economy, 56 (2), 3—24. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.02.003 [in Ukrainian].
8. Aksyonova, S. (2010). Generative activity of the population: formation of the concept. Demography and Social Economy, 2 (14), 56—63. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2010.02.056 [in Ukrainian].
9. Kraievska, H. (2020). Self-organization of the population in the context of development of social capital of Ukraine. Demography and Social Economy, 4 (42), 143—159. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2020.04.143 [in Ukrainian].
10. Diakonenko, O. I., & Kotenko, T. M. (2024). Social capital of households as a means of ensuring the resilience of Ukrainian society. Theory and practice of development of the ecosystem of the social sphere in conditions of the post-war revival of Ukraine: Proc. Int. Sci. & Pract. Conf. (April 17—18, 2024). Kyiv: KNEU. 113—117. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/ 2010/44584 [in Ukrainian].
11. Babarykina, N., Venger, O., Sergiіenko, T., Gotsuliak, V., & Marmilova, O. (2022). European Experience of Decentralization in a Civil Society in the Postmodern Era. Postmodern Openings, 13 (1 Sup1), 137—158.
12. Horemykina, Yu. V. (2009). Problems of the development of non-governmental orga nizations in the field of social services. Demography and Social Economy, 1 (11), 161—168. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2009.01.161 [in Ukrainian].
13. Horemykina, Yu. V. (2022). The role of non-governmental organizations in social in vestment. Demography and Social Economy, 50 (4), 118—135. https://doi.org/10.15407/ dse2022.04.118 [in Ukrainian].
14. Bradshaw, Y. W., & Schafer, M. J. (2000). Urbanization and development: The emergence of international nongovernmental organizations amid decling states. Sociological Per spective, 43 (1), 97—116. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2307/1389784
15. Kaye-Blake, W., Stirrat, K., Smith, M., & Fielke, S. (2017). Testing indicators of resilience for rural communities. New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (NZARES) Conference, October 19—20, 2017, Rotorua, New Zealand.
16. Birkland, T. A., & Warnement, M. K. (2014). Focusing events in disasters and development. In: Disaster and development: Examining global issues and cases. N. Kapucu & K.T. Liou (Eds). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 39—60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-04468-2_3
17. Bellows, J., & Miguel, E. (2009). War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (11—12), 1144—1157.
18. World Giving Index 2023. Charities Aid Foundation (2023). https://www.cafonline.org/ docs/default-source/updated-pdfs-for-the-new-website/world-giving-index-2023.pdf
19. Statistical information (2024). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. https://www.ukrstat. gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
20. Budget of Ukraine. Statistical Digest (2024). Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. https://mof.gov.ua/uk/statistichnij-zbirnik [in Ukrainian].
21. Bodnaruk, B. (2024). Border blockade: why Ukrainians in Poland are silent. Glavcom. https://glavcom.ua/longreads/blokada-kordonu-chomu-movchat-ukrajintsi-u-polshchi991165.html [in Ukrainian].
22. Ukrainian civil society under the war (2023). Report based on the finding of the study (December 2022 — January 2023). UCIPR [in Ukrainian].
23. Mevlja, B., & Podmenik, D. (2021). The role of non-governmental organizations in the regional development of Slovenia: the example of the coastal-karst region. Management, 16 (2), 47—51. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.16.47-51 [in Slovenian].