• Oleksandr Sidorenko European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research


ageing, research evidence, research priorities, policy, European Union


This review article attempts to identify the most promising approaches and models for bridging the gap between research and policy on ageing. The overall goal of the presented analysis of the international experience in elaborating evidence informed policy on ageing is to promote such experience in the countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Formulating the policy relevant research priorities is essential for ensuring the evidence basis in developing, implementing and monitoring policy actions on ageing. Methodologically this article is an analytical review of international policy documents and research initiatives on ageing. It examines the global (United Nations and World Health Organisation) and the European Union experience for the sources of potential models for advancing the national policy on ageing. The review focuses on the research components of the major international policy frameworks on ageing such as the Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing (1982), the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (2002), and the conceptual documents on ageing elaborated by the World Health Organisation. The analysis of the research priorities on ageing formulated in the global and European Union policy documents as well as in the European programmes and projects on research and innovations, reveals the universal prevalence of the social, biomedical (health and care) and economic priorities. During the current decade, active ageing has become the principal content of the policy on ageing in various parts of the world. The author contends that bridging the prevailing gaps between research and policy processes requires reciprocal actions by major national stakeholders, most importantly by academia researchers and policy makers. Such reciprocity requires aligning the research projects with major policy endeavors in order to provide evidence basis for policy actions. The main conclusion of the article asserts that evidence informed policy would help to prevent the reckless manipulations of public opinion and the distortion of policy content during the current upsurge of populism and ignorance.


  1. United Nations (2002). ‘Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing’, in Report of the Second World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid. 8–12 April 2002. New York: United Nations, pp. 1-42.
  2. Sidorenko, A., & Walker, A. (2017). Policy options for responding to population ageing. In: Jean-Pierre Michel, B. Lynn Beattie, Finbarr C. Martin, and Jeremy D. Walston (eds) Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (3 ed.). Oxford University Press.
  3. United Nations (1982). Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing. New York, NY: United Nations.
  4. United Nations (n.d.). Regional Implementation Strategies of the MIPAA. Retrieved from
  5. World Health Organization (2017). Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  6. World Health Organization (2002). Active Ageing – A Policy Framework. A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing, Madrid, Spain, April 2002. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  7. World Health Organization (2004). Towards Age-Friendly Primary Health Care (Active ageing series). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  8. World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  9. World Health Organization (n.d.). Healthy Ageing and Active Ageing. Retrieved from
  10. United Nations (n.d.). The Sustainable Development Agenda. Retrieved from http://www.
  11. World Health Organization (n.d.). Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020–2030. Retrieved from
  12. Sidorenko, A. & Zaidi, A. (2018) International policy frameworks on ageing: assessing progress in reference to the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, vol.16, No. 1, pp. 141-154.
  13. World Health Organization (n.d.). Mid-term progress on the Global strategy. Retrieved from
  14. World Health Organization (2019) Decade of Healthy Ageing. Development of a proposal for a Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020-2030. Report by the Director-General. Retrieved from
  15. United Nations Programme on Ageing and the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2007). Research agenda on ageing for the twenty-first century: 2007 update. New York: UN programme on ageing and IAGG.
  16. Andrews, G., & Sidorenko, A. (2004). RAA-21 Regional Priorities for Asia, Europe, and Latin America, IAG Newsletter, 17(4): 10-12.
  17. Sidorenko, A. (2004). Implementation of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Aging: Research dimension, Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 4(Suppl.s1): S87-S89.
  18. National Research Council (2001) Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for CrossNational Research, Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World, Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  19. European Union (2019) Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in the EU. 2019 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
  20. European Commission (n.d.). Human development and ageing. Retrieved from https://
  21. European Commission (n.d.) Active ageing. Retrieved from main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1062
  22. European Commission (n.d.) Social investment. Retrieved from social/main.jsp?catId=1044&langId=en
  23. SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. (2019). Transforming the Future of Ageing. Berlin: SAPEA. Retrieved from
  24. European innovation partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (n.d.) Repository. Retrieved from
  25. European Commission (n.d.) Research and innovation research-and-innovation_en
  26. European Commission (n.d.) Human development and ageing. Retrieved from https://
  27. European Commission (n.d.) Horizon 2020. Health. Retrieved from programmes/horizon2020/en/area/health
  28. European Commission (n.d.) Horizon 2020. Health, Demographic Change and Wellbeing. Retrieved from health-demographic-change-and-wellbeing
  29. FUTURAGE (2011) A Road Map for European Ageing Research. Retrieved from http://
  30. MoPAct (n.d.) About the project. Retrieved from key-projects/
  31. COST (n.d.) About COST. Retrieved from
  32. COST (n.d.) What are COST Actions? Retrieved from what-are-cost-actions/
  33. European Commission (n.d.) Final Report Summary - SIFORAGE Retrieved from https://
  34. JPI More Years Better Lives (n.d.) Retrieved from
  35. Commission of the European Communities (2008) Towards joint programming in research: Working together to tackle common challenges more effectively. Retrieved from
  36. JPI More Years Better Lives (n.d.) Strategic Research Agenda – SRA. Retrieved from
  37. European Commission (n.d.) Support for policy making. Retrieved from https://ec.
  38. European Commission (n.d.) Responsible research & innovation programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
  39. European Commission (n.d.) Coronavirus research and innovation. Retrieved from
  40. Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
  41. Nutley, S., Davies, H. & Walter, I. (2003). Evidence-based policy and practice: cross-sector lessons from the United Kingdom, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, Issue 20: 29-48
  42. Golubev, A.G. & Sidorenko A.V. (2020). Theory and practice of aging upon COVID-19 pandemic, Adv. geront. 33(2): 397-408.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Sidorenko, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research

Senior Advisor




How to Cite

Sidorenko, O. (2021). GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY ON AGEING. Demography and Social Economy, 46(4), 3–20. Retrieved from



Socio-Demagraphic Processes