SELF-ORGANIZATION OF THE POPULATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL OF UKRAINE

Abstract

The article deals with modern features of self-organization of population in Ukraine from the point of view of accumulation of social capital. The purpose of the article is to identify the characteristics of the infl uence of self-organization on the development of social capital, taking into account the directions of modern transformational changes in Ukrainian society. Research methods: general scientifi c methods of analysis and synthesis are used to collect, process and systematize research results; abstract-logical to establish the relationship between self-organization and social capital; statistical to collect and systematize data; comparison method - to identify whether the dynamics of various forms of self-organization correspond to the needs of society; induction and deduction - to justify the prerequisites for strengthening social capital through self-organization. The basic theoretical approaches to the interconnection of the concepts of social capital and self-organization of the population are summarized. On the basis of generalizations, a scheme of infl uence of self-organization on the accumulation of social capital is developed, which refl ects the ways of accumulation of social capital and determinants of self-organization. The interconnection of the concepts of selforganization of the population and its social capital, which is realized through the norms of interaction, character of values and structure of civic involvement, is established. It is proved that the presence of a suffi cient level of social capital, manifested in trust, solidarity, identity and responsibility, is one of the main determinants of self-organization. The levels of selforganization of the population are distinguished with the identifi cation of peculiarities of in fl uence of social capital on each of them. The i nfl uence of modern basic structural transformations in society on the self-organization of the population in the context of social capital accumulation is evaluated. The c lassifi cation of forms of self-organization on the basis of association (production and consumer interests, values, territory of residence, volume and speed of threats) is carried out. The dynamics of the main forms of self-organization of the population are analyzed and it is found that it refl ects the transformations in the society that are under the infl uence of reforms, but its volumes do not meet the needs of public activity of the population and are not the result of a suffi cient level of social capital, but rather a response to contemporary challenges in society. The prerequisites for strengthening social capital through self-organization, which include identifying and supporting initiative groups of the population, forming a system of feedback from the authorities with the public, professionalizing and expanding the subjects of social dialogue, securing against formalization and creating transparent conditions for the activities of diff erent forms of self-organization, are substantiated, upgrading the skills of civil servants through the formation of public relations competencies.

References:

1. Stepanenko, V. (2001). Sotsialnyi kapital u sotsiolohichnii perspektyvi: teoretyko-met odychni aspekty doslidzhennia [Social capital in sociological perspective: theoretical and methodological aspects of research]. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh — Sociology: theory, methods, marketin, 2, 24-41 [in Ukrainian].
2. Huhnin, E. & Chepak, V. (2001). Fenomen sotsialnoho kapitalu [The phenomenon of social capital]. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh — Sociology: theory, methods, marketin, 1, 49-56 [in Ukrainian].
3. Bova, A. (2003). Sotsialnyi kapital v Ukraini: dosvid empirychnoho doslidzhennia [Social capital in Ukraine: the experience of empirical research], Ekonomichnyi chasopys— ХХІ — Economic Journal — XXI, 5, 46-50 [in Ukrainian].
4. Shynkaruk, V. (Eds.). (1986). Philosophical Dictionary. Kyiv: URE [in Ukrainian].
5. Karpichev, V. S. (2001). Organizaciya i samoorganizaciya social’nyh sistem: slovar’ [Or ganization and self-organization of social systems]. M.: Yzdatelstvo RAHS [in Russian].
6. Luman, N. (1999). Society Th eory (San Foca ’89 Edition). Th eory of society. Digest. A. F. Filippova (Ed.); M.: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole [in Russian].
7. Patman, R., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. Y. (2001). Tvorennia demokratii: Tradytsii hromadskoi aktyvnosti v suchasnii Italii [Creating Democracy: The Traditions of Public Activity in Modern Italy]. Kyiv: Vyd. Solomii Pavlychko “Osnovy” [in Ukrainian].
8. Fukuyama, F. (2004). Doverie: social’nіe dobrodeteli i put’ k procvetaniyu Fukuiama [Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity]. Moskva: AST: Ermak [in Russian].
9. Polishchuk, L. Kak vazhno byt’ social’nym [The importance of being social]. Retrieved from https://iq.hse.ru/news/177673342.html [in Russian].
10. Kozhemiakina, O. M. (2016). Dovira ta sotsialnyi kapital: prostorova tsinnisno-norm atyvna interpretatsiia [Trust and social capital: a spatial value-normative interpretation]. Demohrafi ia ta sotsialna ekonomika — Demography and the social economy, 1, 118-131. doi: 10.15407/ dse2016.01.11 [in Ukrainian].
11. Hripkov, K. A. (2018). Fenomen samoorganizacii v sisteme lokal’nyh vzaimootnoshenij [The phenomenon of self-organization in the system of local relationships]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. — Th eory and practice of social development, Vol. 1. Retrieved from http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/fi les/arhiv_zhurnala/2018/1/sociology/ khripkov.pdf [in Russian].
12. Burkynskyi, B. V. (2013). Sotsialnyi kapital: sutnist, dzherela ta struktura, otsinka [Social capital: essence, sources and structure, valuation]. Ekonomika Ukrainy — Ukraine economy, 1, 67-81 [in Ukrainian].
13. Koulman, Dzh. (2001). Kapital ocial’nyj i chelovecheskij [Capital is social and human]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ — Social Sciences and Modernity, 3, 122-139 [in Russian].
14. Zymohliad, V. Ia. (2016). Fenomen “samoorhanizatsii” v problemnomu poli mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [The phenomenon of “self-organization” in the problematic field of loc al self-government]. Visnyk natsionalnoho universytetu “Iurydychna akademiia imeni Yar oslava Mudroho” — The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 3, 247-251 [in Ukrainian].
15. Novikov, V. M., Semenov, V. V. (2013). Dosiahnennia spravedlyvosti yak umova sotsiohumanitarnoho rozvytku [Achieving justice as a condition of socio-humanitarian developm]. Demohrafi ia ta sotsialna ekonomika — Demography and social economy, 2, 40-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2013.02.040 [in Ukrainian].
16. Kilkist yurydychnykh osib za orhanizatsiinymy formamy / Derzhavna Sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [Number of legal entities by organizational forms / State Statistics Service of Ukraine] www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/edrpoy/ukr/ EDRPU_2016/ks_opfg/arh_ks_opfg_16.ht m [in Ukrainian].
17. Hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: pohliad hromadian. Zahalnonatsionalne doslidzhenn ia hromadskoi dumky naselennia Ukrainy 7.10.2019 / Fond demokratychnykh initsiatyv imeni Ilka Kucheriva [Civil society in Ukraine: the view of citizens. National opinion poll of the population of Ukraine October 7, 2019 / Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation] dif.org.ua. Retrieved from https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanskesuspilstvo-v-ukraini-poglyad [in Ukrainian].
18. Kuznetsova, I. & Mikheieva, O. (2018). NGO Representatives’ View of the Social Cons equences of Forced Displacement in Ukraine. Partnership for Confl ict, Crime and Security Research. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/1247928#.WzpA2X59hE5
19. Novikova, O. F., Amosha, O. I., Antoniuk, V. P. (2016). Internally displaced persons: from overcoming obstacles to success strategies. Retrieved from https://iie.org.ua/wp-content/ uploads/monografi yi/2016/2016_mono_Novikova_Amosha_Antonyuk_2016.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Rehuliuvannia diialnosti hromadskykh orhanizatsii v krainakh YES, SShA ta Kanadi / Yevropeiskyi doslidnytskyi tsentr [Regulation of public organizations in the EU, USA and Canada / European Research Center]. euinfocenter.rada.gov.ua Retrieved from http:// euinfocenter.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/28925.pdf [in Ukrainian].
21. Pro spryiannia rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy [On Promoting Civil Society Development in Ukraine: Presidential Decree]. Retrieved from www.president.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/ 682016-19805 [in Ukrainian].
22. Diialnist hromadskykh orhanizatsii v Ukraini u 2018 r. / Derzhavna Sluzhba statystyk y Ukrainy [Activities of public organizations in Ukraine in 2018 / State Statistics Serv ice of Ukraine] www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Uk rainian].
23. Vittih, V. A. (2011). Mekhanizmy social’noj samoorganizacii [Mechanisms of social selforganization]. Problems of control and modeling in complex systems: proceedings of the XII international conference ‘11- Samara: Sam Scientifi c Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences — Problemi upravleniya i modelirovaniya v slozhnyh sistemah: trudy XІІ mezhdunarodnoj konf. — (pp. 10-17). Samara: Sam NC RAN [in Russian].